{"id":19890249,"updated":"2024-04-10T14:47:43Z","affairType":{"abbreviation":"Pa. Iv.","id":4,"name":"Parlamentarische Initiative"},"author":{"councillor":{"code":2124,"gender":"f","id":156,"name":"Nabholz Lili","officialDenomination":"Nabholz"},"faction":{"abbreviation":"Fraktion R","code":"RL","id":1,"name":"Freisinnig-demokratische Fraktion"},"type":"author"},"deposit":{"council":{"abbreviation":"NR","id":1,"name":"Nationalrat","type":"N"},"date":"1989-12-13T00:00:00Z","legislativePeriod":43,"session":"4311"},"descriptors":[],"drafts":[{"consultation":{"resolutions":[{"category":{"id":3,"name":"Normal"},"council":{"abbreviation":"NR","id":1,"name":"Nationalrat","type":"N"},"date":"1991-03-18T00:00:00Z","text":"Folge gegeben","type":16},{"category":{"id":3,"name":"Normal"},"council":{"abbreviation":"NR","id":1,"name":"Nationalrat","type":"N"},"date":"1994-03-18T00:00:00Z","text":"Abschreibung","type":15}]},"federalCouncilProposal":{},"index":0,"links":[],"preConsultations":[{"committee":{"abbreviation":"RK-NR","id":12,"name":"Kommission für Rechtsfragen NR","abbreviation1":"RK-N","abbreviation2":"RK","committeeNumber":12,"council":{"abbreviation":"NR","id":1,"name":"Nationalrat","type":"N"},"typeCode":1},"date":"1989-12-13T00:00:00Z","registrations":[]}],"references":[],"relatedDepartments":[],"states":[{"date":"\/Date(629506800000+0100)\/","id":229,"name":"Erledigt"}],"texts":[]}],"language":"de","priorityCouncils":[{"abbreviation":"NR","id":1,"name":"Nationalrat","type":"N","priority":1}],"relatedAffairs":[],"roles":[{"councillor":{"code":2124,"gender":"f","id":156,"name":"Nabholz Lili","officialDenomination":"Nabholz"},"faction":{"abbreviation":"Fraktion R","code":"RL","id":1,"name":"Freisinnig-demokratische Fraktion"},"type":"author"}],"sequentialNumber":37,"shortId":"89.249","state":{"id":229,"name":"Erledigt","doneKey":"0","newKey":0},"texts":[{"type":{"id":5,"name":"Eingereichter Text"},"value":"<p>Artikel 343 OR sei folgendermassen zu ergänzen:<\/p><p>Hat im Streitfalle die klagende Partei Tatsachen dargelegt, die die ungleiche Entlöhnung für gleichwertige Arbeit als glaubhaft erscheinen lassen, trifft die beklagte Partei die volle Beweislast für den Gegenbeweis.<\/p>"},{"type":{"id":1,"name":"Titel des Geschäftes"},"value":"Lohngleichheit für Mann und Frau. Beweislastregel"}],"title":"Lohngleichheit für Mann und Frau. Beweislastregel"}